How Do I Run a Performance Review?

Dean Withey 4 min Published 30 Jun 2026 Last reviewed 30 Jun 2026

Running effective performance reviews is vital for employee growth and business success, but it's easy to get wrong. Discover how to build a fair and constructive process to unlock potential and improve outcomes.

The 5-minute answer

To run an effective performance review, set clear goals at the outset and use objective criteria to ensure fairness. Incorporate employee feedback for a two-way dialogue and mutual understanding. Regular reviews, conducted at least annually with more frequent check-ins, help maintain performance and engagement.

Key takeaways

Set clear goals and expectations at the beginning of the review period.
Ensure reviews are fair by using objective criteria and avoiding personal biases.
Incorporate employee feedback for a two-way dialogue and mutual understanding.
Conduct performance reviews at least once a year, with more frequent check-ins as needed.
Use tools like performance management software to streamline the process.

01Goal-settingSet clear goals and expectations at the beginning of the review period.
02EvaluationEvaluate performance using objective criteria to ensure fairness.
03Feedback IncorporationIncorporate employee feedback for a two-way dialogue and mutual understanding.
04Actionable PlansConclude with actionable plans to address areas of improvement or development.

Let's consider Sarah, a marketing assistant at a small UK agency. The agency has decided to implement a quarterly performance review system.

Initial Goal Setting (January): Sarah and her manager, David, agree on three key goals for the quarter: increase social media engagement by 15%, launch a new email marketing campaign, and improve website traffic by 10%.
First Check-in (March): David and Sarah meet to review progress. Social media engagement is up 12%, the email campaign is launched with positive initial results, and website traffic is up 8%. David provides constructive feedback on areas for improvement.
Second Check-in (April): They discuss the final results. Social media engagement reached 18%, the email campaign generated a 20% increase in leads, and website traffic increased by 11%. David acknowledges Sarah’s achievements and sets goals for the next quarter.
Formal Review (April): David documents Sarah’s performance, highlighting her successes and areas for development. They agree on a personal development plan, focusing on advanced social media analytics. This quarterly approach allows for continuous feedback and improvement.

What are the key components of an effective performance review process?

Effective performance reviews aren’t simply about ticking a box. They're a crucial process for employee development and business improvement. The foundation is setting clear goals and expectations from the start of the review period. These should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). This provides a solid basis for evaluation.

Fairness is paramount. Managers must use objective criteria, avoiding personal biases or subjective judgements. Focus on observable behaviours and results, rather than personality traits. Incorporate employee self-assessment to encourage reflection and open communication. A two-way dialogue is essential. The review should be a conversation, not a lecture. Actively listen to the employee’s perspective, address their concerns, and encourage them to share their ideas. Finally, document everything thoroughly. This provides a record of discussions and agreed-upon actions.

How often should performance reviews be conducted?

While annual performance reviews are a minimum standard, relying solely on them can be ineffective. A yearly review provides a formal opportunity to assess overall performance and set future goals, but it doesn’t allow for timely feedback or course correction. More frequent check-ins are crucial for continuous improvement.

Consider implementing quarterly or even monthly one-on-one meetings. These check-ins should be informal and focused on providing ongoing feedback, addressing challenges, and celebrating successes. These regular conversations keep employees engaged and motivated. They also allow managers to identify and address performance issues promptly, before they escalate. The frequency of check-ins should be tailored to the individual employee and their role. High-performing employees may benefit from less frequent check-ins, while those needing more support may require more frequent guidance.

What tools or software can help manage the performance review process?

Running performance reviews manually can take up valuable time and increase the chance of mistakes. Thankfully, performance management software is available to help streamline things and make the process more consistent. These tools typically offer features like setting goals, tracking progress, collecting feedback from multiple sources, and creating reports, all in one place.

They can also automate tasks such as sending out review reminders and building performance reports, saving you even more time. A range of options exists, from simple templates to more complex systems like BambooHR, Workday, and SuccessFactors. When choosing software for your business, think about its size and budget. It’s also important to check if the software will work with any HR systems you already use.

Implementing a good system doesn’t just save time and improve accuracy; it can provide useful insights into how your team is performing. Indeed.com UK confirms that these tools can help ensure consistency in the review process, making it fairer for everyone involved.

What we'd actually do

How Do I Run a Performance Review?

To run an effective performance review, managers should focus on setting clear goals at the outset and using objective criteria to ensure fairness. Incorporating employee feedback is crucial for a two-way dialogue and mutual understanding. Don't rely solely on annual reviews; implement regular check-ins for continuous improvement. I’d also recommend investing in performance management software if your business has more than a handful of employees, to streamline the process and ensure consistency.

Watch on YouTube How Do I Run a Performance Review?

Prefer to watch? The same answer, under five minutes, on YouTube.

Read the transcript

Most managers think the performance review is the meeting. It isn't. The meeting is just the middle part, and it's the parts either side that determine whether anything useful actually happens.

A performance review is a three-phase process: prepare, meet, follow up. All three matter equally. Skip preparation and the meeting becomes a vague catch-up with no anchor. Skip follow-up and nothing changes. Either way, the employee leaves unclear on where they stand, and you've wasted both your time and their goodwill. So let's take each phase in turn.

Before you walk into the room, you need three things. First, pull together goal progress: what did you agree last time, and where does the employee actually stand against those targets? Second, and this is the test: can you name at least two specific examples of their work or behaviour? Not a general impression, actual examples. If you can't, you're not ready. A vague review is worse than no review, because it signals to the employee that you haven't been paying attention. Third, brief the employee in advance. Tell them what you'll be covering and ask them to reflect on their own performance before the meeting. That one step makes the conversation significantly more useful. Preparation is where the hard work happens. The meeting itself is easier when you've done it.

The most common failure in the meeting itself is the manager monologue: the manager talks for forty minutes, asks if there are any questions, and calls it a review. That's a verdict, not a conversation. Start by inviting the employee's self-assessment. Ask them how they think it's gone. Listen before you respond. Then anchor the discussion to the goals you set previously, add your own observations, and back them up with those specific examples you prepared. Where there's a gap between their view and yours, that's where the most useful conversation happens. The review should be a dialogue. The employee should leave feeling heard, not just assessed.

This is where most reviews die. The meeting goes well, both parties feel positive, and then nothing changes because nothing was written down. Before you close the meeting, agree one or two clear next steps. Each one needs an owner and a date. Not a vague intention: a specific action, assigned to someone, with a deadline. Then schedule a check-in. It doesn't need to be another formal review, just a short conversation to see how those actions are tracking. One more principle worth building into your process: the review should never deliver a surprise. If an employee is hearing significant feedback for the first time in the review room, something has already gone wrong.

Great employers, as AHDB notes, operate on a no-surprises basis: the review consolidates what the employee already knows, it doesn't ambush them.

If that was of value, subscribe to the channel for one real business question answered every video. For the same clarity in writing, the website and newsletter is at www.fiveminutebusiness.com.

Five things worth knowing. Every week.

Five curated business answers in your inbox — five minutes, no filler.

Sources

We reviewed 40 sources across 8 research queries, including 5 primary-authority publishers, and selected 7 for citation below (1 primary).